In the council elections on 4 May the fascist British National Party (BNP) is standing 350 candidates, hoping to make a small breakthrough.
They appeal to those who feel themselves âdespondent, depressed, angry, ignored, abandoned, forgotten, ripped off, exploited, overtaxed, unrepresentedâ. They say that the crisis in the Health Service shows âthe profit motive outweighing patient careâ, and denounce âprivate gain for public serviceâ.
In other words, they appeal to many of the same working-class people as socialists appeal to. But the BNP identifies the enemy, the people who are doing the âabandoningâ, the âexploitingâ, the âripping offâ as... âthe forces of multiculturalismâ.
Socialists have our own criticism of official âmulticulturalismâ. Along with promoting openness to other cultures, which is good, it tends to box people off into distinct âculturesâ, each supposed to be welded to a particular ethnic group and religion, rather than working towards a multifarious secular world culture.
But it is whatâs good in official âmulticulturalismâ that the BNP attack, not whatâs bad. In fact their attack isnât really on the established powers. Itâs on Muslims, or people of Muslim background, and anyone who wants to behave even half-decently towards them. The stuff about âmulticulturalismâ is just code.
The BNP appeals to white British self-employed people, small business people, unemployed people, and workers, who are too âdespondentâ and âdepressedâ to take on the real big-business class enemy. It calls on them to support the BNP in having a go at a more vulnerable scapegoat â mostly workers who are even worse âripped off, exploited, and unrepresentedâ than white workers are.
It is sick, poisonous, and dangerous. If this is the âtheoryâ, then racist attacks and racist discrimination are the âpracticeâ. And the longer-term goal of the BNP, like all fascist groups, is to crush the whole labour movement, black and white, and put us all under a fascist dictatorship in the name of fighting the âscapegoatsâ.
How should we combat the BNP? In some areas activists including AWLers have been out with anti-BNP leaflets produced by Searchlight/Stop the BNP or Unite Against Fascism.
The leaflets are useful in exposing the BNP as a fascist, extreme racist party. Their limitation, however, is that are confined to that.
Implicitly, or sometimes fairly explicitly, their conclusion is: vote for any ârespectableâ party, Labour, Lib Dems, Tories, whatever, âto stop the BNPâ. UAF can scarcely say anything else. Although its core activists come from the SWP and the people around London Mayor Ken Livingstone, it was set up as an alliance to include, among its sponsors, several Tories â even hard-right Tories like ex-MP Teddy Taylor and former Orange Order and Monday Club leader Martin Smyth.
But many working-class people who are not âdespondent, depressedâ paranoid racists feel âunrepresentedâ by the big established parties. The mainstream political consensus does shut out working-class people. The Labour Party of today, deep in cahoots with the millionaires whose loans keep it going, allows us scarcely a glimmer of working-class political representation. The working class is effectively disenfranchised, apart from a few socialist or left-Labour candidates here and there.
In times of relatively low unemployment and relatively steady economic growth, like now, a call to working-class people to âvote mainstreamâ to stop the BNP may work up to a point. In times of economic slump and crisis â and capitalism will bring such times, sooner or later â it will not work.
If the socialists and activists are still presenting ourselves then with the message âstick with the mainstream: it may be bad, but not as bad as the BNPâ, then we will drive people into the arms of the BNP. If all they hear the left saying is âgrit your teeth and stay with the status quoâ, then they will feel âabandoned and unrepresentedâ by the left.
Already, in some areas, socialists campaigning for asylum rights often find people who are by no means hardened racists replying: âOK, good luck to the asylum-seekers, and good for them that they have people campaigning for them. But whoâs campaigning for us, the people already here? If nobodyâs listening to us, then we have to stand up for ourselves. If some asylum-seekers get hurt in the process, thatâs a pity...â
This response, starting with a justified feeling of being unrepresented and politically exploited, can quickly turn rancid, into BNP-type scapegoating.
Unless we challenge the shortage of affordable housing, of good schools, of decent jobs, directly â if our effective message to working-class people is that they should accept that shortage, but be generous in sharing out the short supply â we cannot fight the scapegoating effectively.
The fight for:
⢠a revival of publicly-provided cheap local authority housing;
⢠a good local school for every child (under local democratic, not business-peopleâs, control);
⢠an integrated publicly-owned, democratically-controlled Health Service without internal markets and profit calculations;
⢠a shorter working week with no loss of pay, and expanded public services to create decent jobs for all;
⢠a Workersâ Charter of union rights, including the right to take solidarity action
⢠taxing the rich
â this fight is not something desirable but separate, not something that can be postponed in the name of âuniting everyoneâ now against the BNP, but the essential core of any activity which can seriously, in the long term, undercut the BNP.
What we should have is a labour-movement-based campaign which is against the BNP but also for socialist policies, against the Tories, the Lib-Dems, and the Blair-Brown New Labour leadership.
We have to transform the labour movement so that workers are no longer unrepresented. We have to re-gear the labour movement around the fight for a workersâ government â a government that will base itself on working-class organisations and struggles to defy the power of capital and push through those necessary measures for housing, schools, health, jobs. That is what Solidarity and Workersâ Liberty fights for within the labour movement.