the human rights watch organisation is a very small group, compared to the numbers of reporters, the FAZ can afford. i DONT mean to say , so they must be wrong or non-serious, but i still have my doubts, knowing the FAZ from insight. as rightwing reactionists, they are lightyears from whitewashing the "anti-imperialist" posing assad-regime. they had neither reason nor intention 4 false reports, and often have been much more exactly than any other bourgeois paper.
when i said u guys are getting wild, i mainly considered mark´s nonsense-remarks, where he tried to suggest in satirical manner positions i never hed and never expressed. to label me as the stalinoid end of trotskyism and whatever.
so, even if we where to expect or agree, that the hula-masacree was done by assad´s fellows,that wont change a yota of my basic argumentation, where neither u,clive, nor mark argued with. this basic argumentation was
-its the job of each nation, to get rid off his dictators without the "help" of foreign interventions
-cause any of this interventions are alwas for any other reason than selfishless help, protection, freedom &democracy.
u guys tend to forget, that capitalist countries arent democratic either and no lesser evil too.
given AWL´s position
-in supporting the foreign interventions in lybya
-in agreeing with the NATO on war with yugoslawia
-in agreeing with drunkard yeltsin(!) on banning the russian CP (considering an act out of anti-communism as an antistalinist one, and sometimes mixing both)
and many more things like this,i have any reason to keep sceptical, if u guys present to ur readers only those mags, who says hula masacree was done by assad, and keep them from all those who says otherwise. sayin´so, that still dont make me an friend of such regimes, as mark madly tried to paint me. on the other hand, guys from the german militant-tendency once labeled me as anticommunist, when i heavyly attacked an old article of them, where they described syria as an "degenerated workers-state"(!) so this is exactly the childish behaviour in all sects. no reason to take this back.