Add new comment

Submitted by guenter on Sat, 14/05/2011 - 13:33

demagogy as usual: first, the author claims, that we dont know if bin laden tried tried to surrender, so that it wasnt possible to catch him alive. a lie!! the USA already admitted, that bin laden was unarmed, when getting caught.
the article ends with the following conclusion:

Bin Laden was a fascist, a murderer and part of the leadership of a reactionary force who had no qualms about killing or contributing to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of working class people ----------------------------------------------------

iam not at all defending bin laden/al kaida, but where did they kill "hundreds of thousands"? IT IS US-IMPERIALISM WHO DID SO, and this fact always increased the number of mislead young stupids who then joined groups like al kaida.
i must say it clearly:
-no one, who claims to be marxist, can confuse such facts, who killed whom &how many, and
-no one who claims to be marxist can shamelessly ignore the examples i gave, as the USA alone in the chile coup murdering 10 x more than al kaida on their sept.11. so, insted of understanding, how many peoples and countries wud have an reson to do a "war agsinst terror" against the USA, it is said here, that the violation of national sovereignity (thrown aside as "a sham"!!),which includes the risk of a war(!)&any imperialist murder- and terror action is OK, as long as it is against a fascist. thats the legitimation-ideology of the USA himself 4 all their wars ("against fascist sadam hussein"-, against fascist taliban", -"against fascist milosovic"-a.s.o.).(and, following this logic, AWL should support death-penalty against murderers.)
this is the most ugly perversion of all mrxist principles i ever read.
AWL in full defense of all imperialist crimes and "antifascist" unity with warmongers.

This website uses cookies, you can find out more and set your preferences here.
By continuing to use this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.